A Times investigation has found that infiltration efforts were broader than previously disclosed and that state and federal agencies have conducted few forensic inquiries.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/01/us/politics/russia-election-hacking.html
Die Vernichtung nuklear bestückter Mittelstreckenraketen war ein Meilenstein im Tauwetter des Kalten Kriegs. Umso besorgter sehen nicht...
http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/nato-und-russland-lauwarmer-krieg-15178592.html
http://graniru.org/opinion/portnikov/m.263698.html
https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2017/09/01_a_10869488.shtml
http://www.liga.net/opinion/348606_kreml-uzhe-sozdal-v-evrope-putin-intern.htm
http://expert.ru/2017/09/1/putin-davlenie-na-phenyan-ne-pomozhet/
https://www.inopressa.ru/pwa/article/01Sep2017/politico/prop_01.html
In 1976, aged 22, I went with a student delegation to Prague. Then it lay behind an iron curtain that few of us thought would be lifted in our lifetimes. We ha
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/how-the-west-can-defeat-the-kremlin-s-lies-vxblq7cn7
This simple model aims to describe how interference tools can penetrate a target media ecosystem and use it as an echo chamber. While focusing primarily on the U.S. media environment (and the debate about Russian interference as a case study), it does not intend to quantify Russian efforts or to assess whether interference attempts during the 2016 presidential election were successful. Instead, it explores parameters that should inform such an assessment and helps determine whether institutional responses are desirable. This commentary is premised on the U.S.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/exploring-information-laundering-ecosystem-russian-case